Question: What is not inerrant and was never intended to be taken literally?

Published August 7, 2011 by klipa

Answer: THE BIBLE

David Lose has written an excellent article for the religion section of the Huffingtion Post.  Two of my favorite quotes from the article are these:

“We tend to think of anything that is labeled “conservative” as being older and more traditional. Oddly enough, however, the doctrine of inerrancy that literalists aim to conserve is only about a century and a half old.”

AND

‎’Flattening the biblical witness to conform to a reductionist understanding of truth only limits the power of Scripture. As Karl Barth, arguably the twentieth century’s greatest theologian, once said, “I take the Bible too seriously to read it literally.” ‘

Please click on this link and read the article. It’s a good read and very enlightening.

:)

 

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.